Dr. Chang, I commented on Jillian Scholten and Amanda Cruser's papers. Thanks.
“The
Community Educator”
Scott
Rafalski
Dr.
Bo Chang-EDAC 648
What is community?
As time has passed the definition of a
community has become harder and harder.
Many large cities have outlying areas (suburbs) that really are part of
their own distinct community as they are their own city or town. For example, if you look at even the northern
part of the city of Indianapolis you will see that just outside of the city
limits the emergence of Fishers, Noblesville, Westfield, Carmel and Zionsville
just to name a few. One may argue then
that these individuals are not part of the Indianapolis community however a
larger percentage of these individuals commute to work every day within the
city limits of Indianapolis. So, these
individuals tend to have a vested interest within possibly more than one community.
Communities can be rural or urban so the definition tends to be quite general
in nature. “One thinks of communities,
large or small, as clusters of people living in proximity in an area containing
stores and other service facilities for the sustenance of local people and
industries whose produce is distributed through a much wider area (Warren, p.
1).” Warren furthered this definition
by describing communities through sociological, psychological and geographical
perspectives. Psychologists would argue
the term community implies shared interests, characteristics or associations
(Warren, p. 4). Geographers would argue
that community denotes a specific area where people are clustered (Warren, p.
4). Sociologists blend those two
definitions. “Community is defined by
two characteristics: first, a web of affect-laden relationships among a group
of individuals, relationships that often crisscross and reinforce one another
(rather than merely one-on-one or chainlike individual relationships) and
second, a measure of commitment to a set of shared values, norms and meanings
and a shared history and identity in short to a particular culture” Van Der
Veen, p. 581).
“We shall consider a community to be
that combination of social units and systems that perform the major social
functions having locality relevance” (Warren, p. 7). To break this down what Warren was giving
society is a community model. That model
is made up of five functions; production-distribution-consumption,
socialization, social control, social participation and mutual support. Most of
these are pretty self-explanatory.
Mutual support deals with the concept really of helping your neighbor
out when they might be sick or have employment issues for example. Social participation is the idea of getting
and being involved in some way within the local community through possibly a
church and other volunteer possibilities.
Socialization refers to the passing of knowledge and values to others
within the community so think about the school system and the influence that
they have. Social control is normally
thought of the power and influence of the law that is administered through
local courts and the police.
Production-distribution and consumption refers to the access to goods
and services that are normally provided by the local businesses and
companies. This model really makes up
the foundation of a community and makes it specific and different from other
communities.
What
is Community Education?
Community education really refers to
some sort of learning and the process behind that but arguments exist as to
what and how it is learned and also how it can and should be taught. “Community development is, almost
tautologically, the process by which active citizens build their community,
sometimes supported by a professional” (Van Der Veen, p. 580). Van Der Veen breaks down community education
into three distinct parts. First,
education takes place through some sort of training. This is done through some sort of action
oriented, on the job training through a facilitator. (Van Der Veen, p. 581).
Second, education takes place through consciousness-raising. Paulo Freire referred to this as
“transformative learning” (Dirks, p. 2). “Critical consciousness refers to a
process in which learners develop the ability to analyze, pose questions and
take action on the social, political, cultural and economic contexts that
influence and shape their lives” (Dirks, p. 3).
Taking individuals and educating
them and in turn it is hoped that will lead them to some sort of action (Van
Der Venn p. 581). Freire believe that
education was the key to fighting oppression.
Lastly, educating the community through service learning where the
education of the community will in turn service the community (Van Der Veen, p.
581). Examples could include affordable
housing and/or health centers. This
breakdown really shows one the value of community education and the roles that
citizens must play to accomplish this.
It is interesting that community education usually has a positive
connotation associated with it yet the term community doesn’t. Community education is action oriented and
thought of as what is being done and accomplished to assist and help the
community.
Community education programs for
active citizenship should be rational, balanced and neutral in nature (Tobias,
p. 419). Therefore, community education
should not promote any type of political or religious affiliation or be
actively seeking and marketing or promoting.
Programs should also take into account race relations, gender issues and
promote equality for all individuals. This can be a difficult balance but
individuals should not feel or be coerced or brainwashed in any way. Smith summed it up best by saying “education
for community within community”. “In
other words, something called community is not just the place in which
education occurs fostering community is also a central concern” (Smith, p.
1).
Who
are Community Educators?
The perfect answer to this question
is that really anyone and everyone can be community educators. Anyone that has a skill that needs to be
taught or really anyone looking to volunteer and help out and support the community
can provide a role and serve.
-Labor
unions-skilled craftsmen teaching pupils
-Churches-members
within the church that are promoting “good works” within the community
-Adult
education centers-teachers
-Anyone
that speaks English that can help teach ESL individuals
-Senior
citizens looking to give back
-Individuals
with computer skills
-Local
Law Enforcement individuals
-Activists/Environmentalists
that try to teach and raise the consciousness of a particular issue or topic
within the community
-Job
Placement/Career Centers that are teaching readiness skills, interview skills
and resume building
-Community
centers offering GED prep and Adult Basic Education courses/classes
-Community
Colleges offering programs, certificates and degrees
-Nurses
and doctors at local hospitals
Center
for Working Families Interview
Scott Horvath is the Director of the
Center for Working Families located at the downtown Indianapolis Ivy Tech. I had the pleasure of meeting with him on
Thursday, January 23rd, 2014 from 2:00-3:00 PM in his office. The Center for Working Families (CWF) is an
approach to help low-income families reach financial stability and move up the
economic ladder. The CWF offers an
innovative framework for how families can increase their earnings and income
(“Earn it”), reduce their financial transaction costs (“Keep it”) and build
wealth for themselves and their communities (“Grow it”). Ivy Tech Community College is a partner of
the national CWF network. They follow
the national model with a focus on academic goal planning and achievement as
the foundation of moving ahead. The
center is open to anyone, students, staff, faculty or community residents
therefore the participants do not need to be students so it is a true community
agency and also operates as a not for profit.
The CWFs provide academic, coaching, job training financial services,
housing assistance and other supports to help residents secure employment,
advance in their jobs and build assets through savings and homeownership. The center is not just a referral
source. They work actively with
individuals to assess, evaluate and put together a free comprehensive long-term
plan towards financial stability and positive fiscal habits. The initial time commitment is 3-4 hours and
then individuals will develop a plan with quarterly goals and
achievements. Individuals will remain
with the program as long as they are making progress and the commitment could
be 2-3 years. The college partners with
over 100 community agencies to coordinate services for individuals.
Usually the services provided include
access to food pantries, emergency child care and homeless prevention. Once established, the Center will focus on a
broad financial snapshot which will capture one’s credit history and relationships
leading to a financial plan that includes literacy, budgeting, repair and
establishment of good credit. The
academic history will be established next and examined to provide on-going
coaching and planning for attainment and credentials that lead to an
established career and reaching career goals.
Lastly, the coach will work with individuals to secure employment and to
help with the employment search through resume writing and interview prep.
According to Scott really anyone can be
a community educator. He really believes
those that learn best from his program learn from each other support each other
and invest in one another because they have common goals and desires. Scott sees the big community educators as
schools (providing education and skills), banks (providing financial literacy
and debt relief), YMCA, daycares (especially not-for-profit centers), community
centers, groups like the business ownership initiative that promote
entrepreneurships and CICOA which is a coalition on aging and works with that
population.
Scott really felt like he fell into his
job and that is was a bit of a calling.
He was working through the college’s corporate college and had a
background in sales when in 2008-2009 he received a call from the Children’s
Museum and their community development leader.
He was informed about LISC (a nationwide non-profit community
organization) that was looking to start a Center for Working Families in Indy
through Ivy Tech. They explained to him
the mission and goal(s) and the desire to build a strategic plan based on a
better quality of life for individuals.
Before he knew what was really going on he was on an implementation
committee and then that moved to a planning committee. This took over a year of committing and
working with no pay and no guarantee that it would start and begin. It took several months then to take this plan
and to gather interest and market it to the community but also to get buy in
from the college. Eventually Scott was
able to secure a grant and funding for the plan and the Center opened and
started in 2011-2012. He really wanted
to point out that this definitely didn’t happen overnight and he did at times
waiver and wander on the commitment and really wondered if it would happen. He believes without his connections and
relationships and background in sales that this never would have happened.
Scott admits that he still feels he is a
green beginner and not an experienced community educator. He learned a lot of this as on the job
training but he has been with the program from the start. He also visited other CWF’s in the country and
spoke with their directors and can ask them for support and help when
needed. Also, he has partnered with over
100 community agencies and groups so that is another network of support. They have also learned to share a lot of
resources. Everything from
transportation (buses) to gyms to computers.
In a typical day Scott really works with
the 6 neighborhoods that surround Ivy Tech at the downtown location. He stated this week alone he met with a new
pastor of a local church so he introduced that individual to the college and
how they could get involved with some groups and organizations. He also met with a couple of individuals that
started a new business or changed ownership so these relationships are
critical. Most he stated just want to
get involved and see what they can do but don’t know where to start but the CWF
gives them a place to start. Scott also
met with a new police officer who he introduced to the schools head of security
and to the program chair for the criminal justice program and walked him to the
corporate college as they offer some classes in public safety and
workshops. This is on top of doing
workshops, meeting one on one with individuals interested in joining his
program and group, meetings, traveling to see other CWF’s, neighborhood association
meetings and making other various community connections. He couldn’t stress enough the importance of
both the college and the CWF having a community voice and not just sitting back
and letting individuals come to him.
Scott stated his biggest
responsibilities and duties include managing a lot of volunteers. He also is responsible for his own budget so
he has to manage that budget but also secure the funding to keep the CWF
going. A lot of his grants and investors
also want to see progress and numbers so he is responsible for a lot of data
and he has monthly numbers to meet and provide to these individuals. He admits this is the most stressful part of
the job because as he tries to invoke change and good in the community that it
still all comes down to needing the funding or the program would fold.
Lastly, the interview and conversation
shifted when Scott discussed the knowledge and skills that community educators
should have. He stated that individuals
needed to remain open minded and realize what the overall goal is and to always
keep that in mind. He also felt it was
important to keep in mind whose interests one was looking out for. For example, even if he felt passionately
about some type or form of community education he still needed to consider if
it was in the best interests of Ivy Tech since he was employed by them and
representing them. This brings up an
interesting dilemma as one is trying to advocate for community education they
may hit a roadblock and as emotional human beings this can be tough to deal
with. An example that Scott gave was
when his implementation committee developed the plan for CWF a few groups
disagreed with the plan or it didn’t fit their own interests so they fell off
and did not continue to be a part of it.
Findings
What I found out most from this
interview is just how difficult being a community educator can be and how much
hard work truly does go into it. It
isn’t as easy as just coming to work every day, getting paid and helping
individuals. That is definitely a
misconception. Most adult educators
spend a lot of time fighting for their program and selling it. Relationships are critical for this to take
place and happen. Volunteers and
individuals will also come and go so having a strong work ethic also goes a
long way. Community educators also need
to practice patience and be ok with slower results and really check their ego
at the door. They must learn to accept
no as an answer also and be willing not to give up and move on. These same individuals must also learn to be
ok with investing time and energy into individuals that might not complete the
program or keep coming back. Lastly,
these individuals must realize in their role that they are leaders and set a
good example. They are coaches,
teachers, and mentors. So adopting a
moral compass, being ethical and then practicing what they preach is critical
for success.
Implications
I really learned from this interview
that anyone can be a community educator. It doesn’t have to be a calling and
for some people they just kind of fall into it.
For the most part it seems like people with good hearts become community
educators. People looking to change
lives and make a lasting impact in a person’s life. It doesn’t seem like anyone is really doing
it for the money. Also, this is a high
stress position as finding funding tends to be an issue and working on a grant
from year to year or months at a time can prove to be hard. That also really limits what one can do and
can really shape a program. A lot of
community educators tend to be volunteers looking to assist and help out
also. Work environments can prove to be
tough. High stress, trying to market the
program, getting volunteer support and help, trying to manage volunteers,
securing a budget, long hours, working evenings, finding a place to call home,
traveling and being out of office a lot are just a few of the working
conditions and environments for community educators. Community educators have several
responsibilities and duties. Managing
volunteers, budgeting (managing it and securing it), data collection, meetings,
serving on boards and committees, workshops just to name a few.
References
Dirkx, John M. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, Volume 7, (1998) 1-14.
Smith,
George. (July 12, 2008). Explore the theory and practice of community education.
Infed,
Tobias, Robert. International Journal of Lifelong Education, Volume 19, Number 5,
(September-
October 2000) 418-429.
Van Der Veen, Ruud. International Journal of Lifelong
Education, Volume 22, Number 6,
(November-December 2003),
580-596.
Warren, R. L. (1978). The community
in America (3rd ed.). New York: University Press of
America.
Summary of the Community Educator Items
|
Community educators – who are
they? List some examples
-Labor unions-skilled craftsmen teaching pupils
-Churches-members within the church that are
promoting “good works” within the community or pastors or priests
-Adult education centers-teachers
-Anyone that speaks English that can help teach
ESL individuals
-Senior citizens looking to give back
-Individuals with computer skills
-Local Law Enforcement individuals
-Activists/Environmentalists that try to teach and
raise the consciousness of a particular issue or topic within the community
-Job Placement/Career Centers that are teaching
readiness skills, interview skills and resume building
-Community centers offering GED prep and Adult
Basic Education courses/classes
-Community Colleges offering programs,
certificates and degrees
-Nurses and doctors at local hospitals
|
|
Duties/responsibilities
-Managing volunteers
-Budget (Managing it and securing it)
-Data (showing progress and results, are we
reaching our goals? And monthly and weekly reports and numbers to keep the
grants and funding going
-Meetings (neighborhood meetings, one on one with
individuals interested in the program and those involved in it)
-Serving on boards and committees within the
community (Rotary club for example)
-Workshops (financial literacy, orientation)
|
|
Working environments
-High stress
-Quite a bit of travel
-Work evenings or a lot of meetings are in the
evenings
-Long hours
-finding an office and being out of office a lot
|
|
|
|