Wednesday, February 12, 2014

Start of paper 2

Guys, I think we are actually supposed to be using this to discuss our paper. I know we have split up the responsibilities and I sent out an email with the main ideas I pulled from the text and course reading. I'm also going to post it here so maybe we will have a centralized location for questions/discussion/copy and paste the other aspects being worked on?

I wish we could just upload the .docx file so the formatting stays the same...



 

Community Based Learning

Amanda Cruser, John Murray, Katrina Owens, Scott Rafalski, Jillian Scholten

Ball State University

 

Abstract

No indent—abstract starts flush to margin. Also on its own page; if we decide we need one


 

Main Ideas and Concepts of Community and Service Based Learning
        Community based activities, according to Reed and Marienau (2008), follow similar paths of development and include the following four dimensions:

1.      Duration

2.      Scope

3.      Intensity

4.      Reflection

Duration is used in reference to the length of time the program course is expected to last; the longer the time spent in the service or community learning task, the more improved the students’ skillset (Reed & Marienau, 2008). The scope of community based learning programs is the specific task or activity of which the students will be engaged; such as working with the homeless, reintroducing felons to community, or working in more general terms of organizational planning (Reed & Marienau, 2008).  The third dimension of community based learning programs applies to the intensity of the program, not to be confused with intensity as a measure of duration, but of the degree to which the students are affected by the program and course content (Reed & Marienau, 2008).  This is to say the intensity signifies the emotional and reflective degree of students’ interest in the population they are serving and the task being attended to (Reed & Marienau, 2008). 

Finally the reflection period of the community based learning program concerns itself as the “essential dimension of service [community based] learning” (Reed & Marienau, 2008).  The reflection component of a community based program can be satisfied through the use of daily logs, open discussion, or a more in-depth method of journaling to allow the student to “identify, frame, and resolve ill-structured social problems” (Reed & Marienau, 2008).  These dimensions work together in such a manner as to stimulate and develop cognitive and moral growth of the student as well as to improve the learners overall well-being as community based learning also offers practice in social and professional situations.

            This  specific type and purpose of the learning occurring in community or service learning can be encapsulated as learning that “emphasizes the social or communal as opposed to the individual” (Stein & Imel, 2002).  Therefore, in connection to the previously discussed dimensions of community based learning, the program must also contain the scope of working directly with or in some manner as to better the lives of the population being served through the learning.  Stein and Imel (2002) further expanded on the dimensions by identifying some common themes of community learning. 
The authors suggest four basic themes of “learning communities” related to the place, the content, civic engagement, and power and politics (Stein & Imel, 2002).  In this regard the place of the learning can be just as important as the duration of the program and afford more variance in the scope as, according to Stein and Imel (2002), the place of the learning can be neutral and offers more flexibility in that the place is regarded as a realm that allows members of different communities to “engage with each other on specific concerns” for their communities.  Through this process of learning within a place in a community, the societal structure and individuals within that community can produce “community wisdom” as the “knowledge is applied to improve the daily life activities” of the community as a whole (Stein & Imel, 2002). 

The third theme Stein and Imel (2002) point out is that learning in community “encourages citizens to produce local knowledge.”  This benefits the overall community as members actively engaged in the learning are better equipped with the knowledge needed to enable all other members to improve the community dynamic.  Finally, the “power structure” of the community can be strengthened by active members and put the community in capable position to reflect upon and suggest political and social changes (Stein & Imel, 2002).  Overall the importance of both the dimensions and themes of community learning cannot be overlooked, nor can they be separated as the two work in tandem to benefit the local community.

            Here we would need a short intro for the programs and why we chose them as our case studies.

            

Case Studies

(#1 Insert Name of Program)

 

 

(#2 Insert Name of Program)


 

Program Data

charts, handouts, links, syllabi, etc…


 

Discussion

Summary of paper and program information

 

 

References

 

Reed, S.C. & Marienau, C. (Eds.). (2008). Linking adults with community: Promoting civic engagement through community based learning. New Directions for Adult and Community Education, 118.

Stein, D.S. & Imel, S. (2002). Adult learning in community: Themes and threads. New Directions for Adults and Community Education, 95.
 

Table 1. Summary of the Community Based Learning Activities

 
Providers
Learners, purposes, learning objectives
How the activities were designed
Main ideas/features you have learned (Check Discussions)
Suggestions for practitioners (check Discussions)
Learning activity 1
 
 
 
 
 
Learning activity 2
 
 
 
 
 
Learning activity 3
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment